Search found 98 matches
- Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:39 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: See only the last X messages
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3925
Re: See only the last X messages
Thanks! However, I need it only for 1 specific account...
- Thu Sep 01, 2016 9:50 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: See only the last X messages
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3925
See only the last X messages
Is there a way to see (via IMAP) not all messages but only up to the last X messages?
If not, please make it possible...
Thanks!
If not, please make it possible...
Thanks!
- Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:37 pm
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
I've started to successfully use 1.0.2d.
For those who want no dependencies on MS VC++ runtime, I'm talking about openssl-1.0.2d-i386-win32.zip
For those who want no dependencies on MS VC++ runtime, I'm talking about openssl-1.0.2d-i386-win32.zip
- Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:16 pm
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
OpenSSL was partially breached. Here's the official statement , but you can read about "heartbeat" in the news. I'm happy to report the fixed (i.e. latest) version so far works fine with PP. For those who want no dependencies on MS VC++ runtime, I'm talking about openssl-1.0.1g-i386-win32....
- Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:37 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OWA support with PP (via 3rd party utility)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 32781
Re: OWA support with PP (via 3rd party utility)
Nice. But is there no way to make it IMAP so it would work naturally with Exchange (as in keep everything in the server)?
- Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:12 pm
- Forum: Email
- Topic: New Google Labs
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5246
Re: New Google Labs
Ever since yesterday, it became an official feature!war1 wrote:Recent labs are IMAP Advanced Control. When set up correctly, deleting an email in IMAP Inbox will delete the message to Trash or Deleted Items folder.
- Thu May 05, 2011 5:40 pm
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
That version gave me the same error today. It doesn't happen often, but when it does happen it crashes PP.
- Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:15 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
I got the random error again! Since it's obviously here to stay, can you please start investigating it?
- Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:54 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
Actually, I only got the aforementioned error once and so ended up not downgrading.
I've then started to successfully use 1.0.0c (from the default build made by Win32 OpenSSL v1.0.0c Light).
For those who want no dependencies on MS VC++ runtime, it also works with openssl-1.0.0c-i386-win32.zip
I've then started to successfully use 1.0.0c (from the default build made by Win32 OpenSSL v1.0.0c Light).
For those who want no dependencies on MS VC++ runtime, it also works with openssl-1.0.0c-i386-win32.zip
- Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:19 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
Well, I've just started to successfully use 1.0.0b (from the "slightly patched" build made by Win32 OpenSSL v1.0.0b Light)...until I got this random crash: openssl1b.jpg I guess it's back to v1.0.0.0a for me. But why is it random? Meanwhile, there's currently no MS VC++ runtime-free version.
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:34 pm
- Forum: Email
- Topic: One of the Best Free Email Services - Yahoo Mail
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17434
Re: One of the Best Free Email Services - Yahoo Mail
But it's just a one time thing. You do it once and then forget about it.war1 wrote:I know that Gmail has a lab that can kinda simulate how IMAP is normally implemented. I have one set up. But the change require several steps, not a one button implementation.
- Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:46 am
- Forum: Email
- Topic: One of the Best Free Email Services - Yahoo Mail
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17434
Re: One of the Best Free Email Services - Yahoo Mail
And as for tags, well, let's just say that there's a good chance that PP will use the idea of tags where folders would have once been used. Keep in mind that even before Gmail gave up on forcing conversations (which were only forced in PP's webmail mode anyway), it gave up on forcing tags. That is,...
- Sun Jun 20, 2010 5:27 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
I've started to successfully use 1.0.0a (from the default build made by Win32 OpenSSL v1.0.0a Light).
For those who want no dependencies on MS VC++ runtime, it also works with openssl-1.0.0a-i386-win32.zip
For those who want no dependencies on MS VC++ runtime, it also works with openssl-1.0.0a-i386-win32.zip
- Mon May 24, 2010 6:48 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
I've started to successfully use 1.0.0 (from the default build made by Win32 OpenSSL v1.0.0 Light) - that's right, v1.0.0!
- Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:07 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
I've started to successfully use 0.9.8l (just Google OpenSSL-0.9.8l-Win32.zip).
- Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:03 am
- Forum: Email
- Topic: Microsoft to retire the DAV protocol (Hotmail)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7288
Re: Microsoft to retire the DAV protocol (Hotmail)
Is there anything that does use it except Hotmail itself? Being Microsoft, it's got to be a violation for other programs to use it.
- Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:38 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
Jeff asked for no direct links (I gave enough of a hint to get there). Also, we all know where the official site is.
- Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:20 pm
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL
I've started to successfully use 0.9.8k (just Google OpenSSL-0.9.8k.dll.zip).
- Tue Feb 03, 2009 5:55 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL 0.9.8j
Nevertheless, your plugin's page casually claims they're less secure.
- Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:54 am
- Forum: POP Peeper
- Topic: OpenSSL
- Replies: 55
- Views: 53393
Re: OpenSSL 0.9.8j
But is it less secure than the default build because you're limited by your local law?